Interior Protocol Projects Examples using NS2

Interior Protocol Projects Examples using NS2 tool best research ideas are shared ere are several project ideas for accomplishing and experimenting with Interior Gateway Protocols (IGPs) in NS2 (Network Simulator 2). These protocols perform in a single autonomous system and are frequently used for routing inside an organization’s network.

  1. Basic OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) Simulation
  • Description: Design OSPF in NS2 and replicate a simplified network topology. Evaluate how OSPF uses link-state advertisements (LSAs) to find paths. Estimate performance metrics involves packet delivery ratio, routing overhead, and convergence time.
  • Objective: Understand the functioning of OSPF as an interior routing protocol and analyze its efficiency in finding finest routes.
  1. Performance Comparison of OSPF and RIP (Routing Information Protocol)
  • Description: Mimic a network using both OSPF and RIP in NS2. Compare their performance based on convergence time, routing overhead, and packet loss in various network topologies (like star, ring, and mesh).
  • Objective: Compare a link-state protocol (OSPF) with a distance-vector protocol (RIP) and assess their strengths and vulnerabilities in several situations.
  1. OSPF Scalability Analysis in Large Networks
  • Description: Imitate a large-scale network with a huge amount of nodes using OSPF in NS2. Learn how OSPF operates as the amount of nodes rises, especially based on routing table size, control overhead, and convergence time.
  • Objective: Assess the scalability of OSPF in large networks and detect capable bottlenecks or restrictions.
  1. Hierarchical OSPF (Multi-Area OSPF) Simulation
  • Description: Establish a multi-area OSPF set up in NS2. Simulate a network that breaks down into various OSPF areas, with area border routers (ABRs) linking them. Analyze the influence of hierarchical OSPF on routing table size and control overhead compared to flat OSPF configurations.
  • Objective: Study the advantages of hierarchical OSPF in large networks and how it minimizes routing overhead by segmenting the network into shorter areas.
  1. RIP in a Dynamic Network (Mobile Nodes)
  • Description: Execute RIP in a network where nodes are mobile, replicating a dynamic environment in NS2. Understand how RIP manages route varies because of node movement and compute its performance depend on route stability, packet loss, and convergence time.
  • Objective: Evaluate the efficiency of RIP in highly dynamic environments and detect its restrictions depend on convergence and scalability.
  1. QoS-Aware OSPF Implementation
  • Description: Optimize OSPF to attach Quality of Service (QoS) parameters like bandwidth and delay in its route selection process. Simulate QoS-aware OSPF in NS2 and assess its performance in managing traffic variants with several demands (such as VoIP, video streaming, and data).
  • Objective: Enhance OSPF routing decisions by integrating QoS metrics to assists delay-sensitive and bandwidth-intensive applications.
  1. OSPF with Traffic Engineering (TE) Simulation
  • Description: Develop traffic engineering extensions in OSPF (OSPF-TE) to improve network resource consumption. Imitate a scenario where OSPF-TE is used to disperse traffic through several routes, ignoring congestion. Evaluate its impact on throughput, delay, and packet loss.
  • Objective: Know how OSPF-TE can enhance traffic distribution and network performance by leveraging numerous paths in a network.
  1. Fault-Tolerant OSPF in NS2
  • Description: Imitate a network using OSPF and launch random link or node failures. Assess how fastly OSPF identifies these failures and recalculates paths. Measure the effect on packet loss, recovery time, and entire network performance.
  • Objective: Evaluate OSPF’s fault tolerance and its capability to uphold network connectivity during failures.
  1. Performance of RIP in Converged and Non-Converged States
  • Description: Accomplish RIP in a large network topology in NS2. Evaluate its performance during the convergence process after network varies (such as link failures, node additions). Compute metrics like packet loss, routing loops, and convergence time.
  • Objective: Understand the restrictions of RIP depend on slow convergence and routing loops and propose possible enhancements.
  1. RIP with Split Horizon and Poison Reverse
  • Description: Include split horizon and poison reverse features in RIP to evade directing loops in NS2. Emulate a network with and without these mechanisms and compare the performance depend on packet loss, route stability, and control overhead.
  • Objective: Assess the effectiveness of loop prevention techniques in RIP and know how they optimize routing performance.
  1. OSPF vs. EIGRP (Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol) Performance Comparison
  • Description: Accomplish both OSPF and EIGRP in NS2 and compare their performance in various network topologies. Estimate metrics like convergence time, control overhead, and packet delivery ratio in normal and failure situations.
  • Objective: Compare a link-state protocol (OSPF) and a hybrid protocol (EIGRP) according to its efficiency, scalability, and adaptability to network changes.
  1. Load Balancing with OSPF Equal-Cost Multi-Path (ECMP)
  • Description: Develop Equal-Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) routing in OSPF in NS2. Mimic a scenario where traffic can be allocated over several equal-cost paths. Analyze the influence of load balancing on throughput, delay, and congestion.
  • Objective: Know how OSPF with ECMP can enhance load distribution and entire network performance by consuming several paths.
  1. Energy-Efficient OSPF in Wireless Networks
  • Description: Alter OSPF to attach energy-aware routing decisions in wireless networks. Emulate an energy-efficient OSPF protocol in a wireless network using NS2 and estimate energy utilization, network lifetime, and routing efficiency.
  • Objective: Minimize energy usage in wireless networks by improving OSPF for energy-aware routing decisions.
  1. Link-State Flooding Optimization in OSPF
  • Description: Model OSPF in NS2 and explore ways to enhance link-state flooding by minimizing the frequency or size of link-state advertisements (LSAs). Compute the impact on control overhead, convergence time, and routing precision.
  • Objective: Understand how to reduce OSPF control overhead while maintaining precise and timely directing information.
  1. RIP with Triggered Updates
  • Description: Accomplish triggered updates in RIP to speed up the convergence process when network changes happen. Simulate scenarios with frequent link varies in NS2 and compare the performance of RIP with and without triggered updates.
  • Objective: Learn how triggered updates enhance RIP’s responsiveness to network alterations and minimize convergence time.
  1. OSPF with IPv6 Support
  • Description: Establish OSPFv3 (OSPF for IPv6) in NS2 and imitate a dual-stack (IPv4/IPv6) network. Assess the performance of OSPFv3 depend on packet delivery ratio, routing overhead, and convergence time in IPv6 scenarios.
  • Objective: Familiarize the variations among OSPF for IPv4 and OSPFv3 for IPv6 and study its performance in next-generation IP networks.
  1. RIPng (RIP for IPv6) Performance Simulation
  • Description: Execute RIPng in NS2 and mimic a network using IPv6 addresses. Compare the performance of RIPng with historical RIP (for IPv4) based on packet delivery, routing overhead, and convergence time.
  • Objective: Assess the differences amongst RIP and RIPng in managing IPv6 traffic and know how RIPng works in advanced networks.

The above project ideas cover numerous properties of Interior Gateway Protocols like OSPF, RIP, and EIGRP in NS2, offering openings to explore routing performance, scalability, fault tolerance, and optimization strategies. We intent to deliver the overall implementation of IGP protocol, if you want.