L3 Protocols Projects Examples Using NS2

L3 Protocols Projects Examples Using NS2 tool project ideas which we worked and working at present are listed below. You can choose any of these ideas, and if you’re interested in pursuing one, our team is ready to provide you with tailored topic selection and research support. Here are various project ideals containing Layer 3 (L3) protocols that can be executed using NS2:

  1. Performance Comparison of RIP and OSPF in Large-Scale Networks
  • Objective: Compare the performance of RIP (Routing Information Protocol) and OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) within large-scale networks.
  • Method: Replicate a large-scale network within NS2 using RIP and OSPF as routing protocols. Investigate the performance metrics like convergence time, packet delivery ratio, routing overhead, and end-to-end delay in various network scenarios, containing network growth and link failures.
  • Outcome: A comparative analysis of the scalability and effectiveness of RIP and OSPF, with insights into that protocol executes better in large and dynamic networks.
  1. Energy-Efficient Routing using OSPF in Wireless Networks
  • Objective: Alter the OSPF protocol to execute an energy-efficient routing for wireless networks.
  • Method: Mimic a wireless network within NS2 using OSPF and change the protocol to take node energy levels into account when choosing routes. Estimate the performance protocols like network lifetime, energy consumption, and packet delivery ratio.
  • Outcome: An energy-optimized version of OSPF, which extends the network lifetime even though maintaining efficient routing, especially in energy-constrained wireless environments.
  1. BGP and OSPF Interoperability in ISP Networks
  • Objective: Replicate the communication among BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) and OSPF in an Internet Service Provider (ISP) network that concentrating on route redistribution amongst the two protocols.
  • Method: Mimic an ISP network using NS2 in which BGP is used for inter-domain routing and OSPF for intra-domain routing. Execute the route redistribution among BGP and OSPF, and examine the influence on routing table size, route selection, and traffic flow.
  • Outcome: Insights into the challenges of BGP and OSPF interoperability and finest practices for effective route redistribution in ISP networks.
  1. Dynamic Routing with EIGRP in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs)
  • Objective: Calculate the performance of EIGRP (Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol) in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs), in which node mobility triggers frequent topology changes.
  • Method: Replicate a MANET in NS2 using EIGRP, in which nodes are move based on various mobility models (e.g., Random Waypoint). Calculate the performance metrics such as convergence time, packet delivery ratio, and routing overhead under various mobility conditions.
  • Outcome: A performance analysis of EIGRP’s ability to manage the dynamic and rapidly changing topologies in MANETs, with recommendations for enhancing its performance in mobile environments.
  1. OSPF with Multi-Area Design for Scalable Networks
  • Objective: Execute a multi-area OSPF design in NS2 to evaluate the scalability of OSPF in large networks.
  • Method: Mimic a large-scale network including numerous OSPF areas within NS2. Examine the influence of split the network into areas on routing efficiency, then convergence time, and routing overhead. Compare the performance of a multi-area OSPF design as well as a single-area design.
  • Outcome: A comprehensive analysis of how OSPF’s hierarchical design (using areas) enhances the scalability, minimizes routing overhead, and speeds up convergence in large networks.
  1. QoS-Aware Routing with OSPF for Real-Time Applications
  • Objective: Execute the Quality of Service (QoS) support in the OSPF protocol to select the real-time traffic in networks with time-sensitive applications like VoIP or video streaming.
  • Method: Replicate a network within NS2 using OSPF and alter the protocol to encompass QoS-aware metrics like bandwidth, delay, and jitter. Estimate the performance parameters like latency, jitter, and packet loss for real-time and non-real-time traffic.
  • Outcome: A QoS-optimized version of OSPF, which enhances the service delivery for real-time applications, make sure that better network performance and user experience.
  1. Convergence Time Analysis of OSPF and EIGRP under Network Failures
  • Objective: Compare the convergence time of OSPF and EIGRP in reaction to network failures like link or router outages.
  • Method: Mimic a network using NS2 in which EIGRP and OSPF are used as routing protocols. Launch the network failures at random points and compute the time taken for the protocols to converge and restore full connectivity. Compare the outcomes for various network topologies and failure scenarios.
  • Outcome: A comparative analysis of OSPF and EIGRP that concentrating on their ability to rapidly adjust the modifications and reinstate the connectivity in networks with dynamic topology changes.
  1. Security Enhancements in RIP for Protection against Routing Attacks
  • Objective: Execute the security mechanisms within the RIP protocol to defend versus routing attacks like route spoofing and blackhole attacks.
  • Method: Replicate a network within NS2 using RIP as the routing protocol and launch the malicious nodes, which try to interrupt the routing process by transmitting false routing data. Execute the security aspects like cryptographic route authentication and packet integrity verifies to mitigate these attacks. Assess the efficiency of these security mechanisms.
  • Outcome: A secure version of RIP with a comprehensive analysis of its ability to avoid the routing attacks and maintain routing integrity, even in front of malicious nodes.
  1. MPLS Integration with OSPF for Fast Packet Forwarding
  • Objective: Execute the MPLS (Multiprotocol Label Switching) with OSPF in a network to enhance the packet forwarding speed and minimize the latency.
  • Method: Mimic a network within NS2 using OSPF for routing and MPLS for packet forwarding. Execute the label switching paths (LSPs) in the MPLS-enabled routers and then calculate the influence on packet forwarding speed, latency, and throughput. Compare MPLS-enabled OSPF with an old OSPF network.
  • Outcome: A performance calculation of how MPLS improves the packet forwarding in OSPF-based networks, minimizing latency and then enhancing overall throughput.
  1. Load Balancing using Equal-Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) in OSPF
  • Objective: Execute an Equal-Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) routing in OSPF to distribute traffic over several equal-cost paths and enhance the load balancing in the network.
  • Method: Replicate a network within NS2 using OSPF and setup ECMP to use various equal-cost paths among origin and end nodes. Compute the performance metrics like traffic distribution, throughput, and latency under differing traffic loads.
  • Outcome: An analysis of how ECMP enhances the load balancing, minimizes congestion, and then improves network performance by distributing traffic more effectively over numerous paths.
  1. EIGRP Scalability Analysis in Large-Scale Enterprise Networks
  • Objective: Assess the scalability of EIGRP in large-scale enterprise networks that concentrating on its ability to manage the large numbers of nodes and subnets.
  • Method: Mimic a large enterprise network within NS2 using EIGRP and calculate the protocol’s performance as the network size maximizes. Investigate the parameters like routing table size, convergence time, and routing overhead as the number of nodes and subnets increases.
  • Outcome: Insights into the scalability of EIGRP, including recommendations for enhancing its performance in large enterprise networks.
  1. IPv6 Support in OSPF for Future-Proof Networks
  • Objective: Estimate and execute the performance of OSPFv3, the IPv6-compatible version of OSPF, in a dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 network.
  • Method: Replicate a network using NS2 with both IPv4 and IPv6 nodes are using OSPFv2 for IPv4 and OSPFv3 for IPv6. Compare the performance of OSPFv3 with OSPFv2 such as route discovery time, packet delivery ratio, and latency. Investigate the influence of IPv6 deployment on routing performance.
  • Outcome: A performance comparison of OSPFv2 and OSPFv3, including insights into how OSPFv3 assists IPv6 and the challenges of transitioning to IPv6 networks.
  1. Routing Performance in Dual-Stack Networks using OSPFv3
  • Objective: Examine routing performance in a dual-stack (IPv4/IPv6) network utilising OSPFv3.
  • Method: Mimic a dual-stack network using NS2 in which both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses coexist. We can be used the OSPFv3 for routing and measure how effectively the protocol manages the dual-stack traffic. Calculate the performance metrics like routing convergence, packet delivery ratio, and latency for both IPv4 and IPv6 traffic.
  • Outcome: A comprehensive analysis of OSPFv3’s ability to manage the dual-stack traffic effectively, with recommendations for enhancing routing performance in mixed IPv4/IPv6 environments.

At the end, we had thoroughly demonstrated several project examples provide a wide range of applications for Layer 3 (L3) protocols like RIP, OSPF, EIGRP, and BGP, permitting you to discover routing performance, scalability, energy efficiency, security, and Quality of Service (QoS) in numerous network environments using the simulation environment NS2. Furthermore, we will also be presented additional projects ideas regarding this L3 protocols through another manual.